I was talking with my family the other night about the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, and my Mom said said something some to me I'll never forget.
She said with tears welling up in her eyes "More than anything the tsunami makes me realize that we as humans are nothing more than guests on this planet. We have no control over the natural disasters that occur."
She couldn't be more right.
Earth is one of the planets in our solar system: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus. We know based on scientific research that each of the planets is made up of chemicals that, as far as we know, make them inhabitable. Some we can't breathe on, some are too hot, and others are simply too cold. The point is, they are what they are. We can't change them - we can only discover and learn as much about them as we can. We could only survive on those planets if we chose to. In other words, we can only survive on them if we create and evolve ways to survive based on what happens on those planets.
What makes Earth any different from other planets? The only thing I can think of is that we HAVE created ways to survive - foraging for food, cleaning and filtering water, and providing shelter (you know, Oregon Trail shit). Those three things are the absolute necessities to survive as humans. And what are they all based on? Surviving natural occurrences: rain, snow, sunlight, and other [what we call] natural disasters: volcanoes, hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, and earthquakes.
An earthquake is a shaking or trembling of the earth that is either volcanic or tectonic in origin. Obviously there is something that triggers them, but we are yet to discover exactly what it is. The point, however, is that it's completely natural - it can't be predicted (yet) and more importantly can't be controlled. Therefore we are inhabiting a world - a planet - that we have no control over. Our time here is not necessarily never-ending. We've simply built structures to function in: homes, offices, stadiums, etc.
As we've seen from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, the planet does not care what we've built and where we've built it. The world is, like Buck Owens would say, acting naturally.
My underlying question is: based upon this analysis why can't we as humans understand that we are not invincible? Why can't we take advantage of the time we DO have here, whether it is coming to an end in 2012 or not? In my mind, the most important aspect of life is to do whatever it takes to be happy with myself and the things I do.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
If the NHL wanted to make money
If NHL wanted to make money, they would find a way for the St. Louis Blues and Tampa Bay Lightning to make it to Game 7 of the Stanley Cup. St. Louis vs. St. Louis.
Think about it. The Blues have yet to win a Stanley Cup, not to mention they have been struggling this year because of a malicious hit to Perron by none other than Twinkle Toes Joe Thornton, who received only a 2-game suspension while Perron is STILL dealing with post-concussion symptoms.
Regardless of how terribly way NHL dealt with the situation, the Blues have had a rough year because of several injuries (Oshie, McDonald, Halak, Steen, Jackman to name a few) and calling the Peoria Rivermen to send us the best players they've got. Now granted the kids they have sent to St. Louis aren't bad, they are simply young and inexperienced at the NHL level.
Turning our focus to the Tampa Bay Lightning, they, too, have had an underwhelming year considering Stamkos and St. Louis were two of the top five in points for the first half of the season. It doesn't help when their front office acquires Goaltender Dwayne Roloson after fracturing his collarbone in a fight with Penguins Goaltender Brent Johnson, not to mention Roloson has been around for years and consistently puts up mediocre numbers at best.
Realistically the Lightning and Blues will not face each other in the Stanley Cup finals because Tampa Bay and St. Louis are not where the money for the NHL is. Sure they're great teams, but we all know that the NHL would easily make more money with teams like the Red Wings, Penguins, Rangers, Canadiens, etc. in the playoffs.
Think about it. The Blues have yet to win a Stanley Cup, not to mention they have been struggling this year because of a malicious hit to Perron by none other than Twinkle Toes Joe Thornton, who received only a 2-game suspension while Perron is STILL dealing with post-concussion symptoms.
Regardless of how terribly way NHL dealt with the situation, the Blues have had a rough year because of several injuries (Oshie, McDonald, Halak, Steen, Jackman to name a few) and calling the Peoria Rivermen to send us the best players they've got. Now granted the kids they have sent to St. Louis aren't bad, they are simply young and inexperienced at the NHL level.
Turning our focus to the Tampa Bay Lightning, they, too, have had an underwhelming year considering Stamkos and St. Louis were two of the top five in points for the first half of the season. It doesn't help when their front office acquires Goaltender Dwayne Roloson after fracturing his collarbone in a fight with Penguins Goaltender Brent Johnson, not to mention Roloson has been around for years and consistently puts up mediocre numbers at best.
Realistically the Lightning and Blues will not face each other in the Stanley Cup finals because Tampa Bay and St. Louis are not where the money for the NHL is. Sure they're great teams, but we all know that the NHL would easily make more money with teams like the Red Wings, Penguins, Rangers, Canadiens, etc. in the playoffs.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)